Healthcare Policy and Impact Evaluation

We perform theory-based rigorous systematic reviews and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of development interventions using experimental and quasi-experimental studies. Our team has expertise in data analysis, qualitative and quantitative research methods and we continue to enhance the quality of systematic review methodologies by following internationally accepted standards. We appraise and synthesize the available high-quality evidence and use to inform policy decision making and greater effectiveness for public and private services around the world. We combine peer-reviewed evidence with local knowledge to provide decision-makers with justified recommendations for project and policy changes that safeguard and enhance health.

• Develop reviews through a process that ensure that are accurate, methodologically sound, comprehensive, and unbiased. Evidence-gap analysis to address the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions
• Systematic Review and Evidence mapping: Conduct systematic reviews or evidence mapping on demand. Our Evidence mapping or Evidence gap map collect existing information about the effect of policies, programs, and practices. The report provides information related to the study background, methods, and results of what the map means.
• Develop Briefs, Score papers, writing systematic review summaries, working papers for policy, programming, practise or further research.
• Conducting reviews to evaluate healthcare economic impact or social impact
• Guires examine evidence and integrates synthesis to design and develop continue intervention.
• We work on Maternal and Child Health, Adolescent Sexual and reproductive health, HIV and AIDS, Immunization evidence programs, nutrition, genetics, healthcare technologies, and chronic disease.